Show/Hide

Serving the community is of utmost importance, however, due to the financial effects caused by COVID-19, we are unable to process unsolicited requests for funding at this time. In addition, the Local Entity grant application process is currently closed.

  • newspaper press release

News Releases

Print
Press Enter to show all options, press Tab go to next option

Current IID News

Following are recent news items from IID. For additional news items through 2016, click on the archive link below. For all others, please contact IID's records management section.  

Are you interested in receiving automatic e-mail notices when we post news items? Click here to learn more.

Oral argument scheduled in case over water rights

The Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeal, in the Michael Abatti, et al. v. Imperial Irrigation District case, has scheduled oral argument starting at 9 a.m. on Friday, June 12 in the San Diego courtroom.
Post Date:05/18/2020

The Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeal, in the Michael Abatti, et al. v. Imperial Irrigation District case, has scheduled oral argument starting at 9 a.m. on Friday, June 12 in the San Diego courtroom.

“It has taken a long time to get to this point, so IID is pleased to learn that oral argument has been scheduled in this case, and the district will now have its day in court to defend the public interest and the reasonable and beneficial use of water by all of its water users,” said IID board President Norma Sierra Galindo.

“The outcome of this case will shape the future of the Imperial Valley's water rights,” Galindo said. “It goes to the heart of IID's responsibility as trustee of the district's historic water rights, and to whom it is owed: private interests or the public.”

In September 2017, IID filed its appeal of the August 2017 decision by an Imperial County Superior Court judge. The decision ruled against the district invalidating IID’s method of apportioning water, known as the Equitable Distribution Plan, based on the conclusion that agricultural landowners owned the water rights held by the district.

That judgment contained several findings, conclusions and rulings of great concern to IID, including a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the water rights held by IID and other legal errors that could jeopardize the Imperial Valley’s historic water rights and restrict the district’s ability to provide reliable water supplies to all of its customers in the future.

Throughout the case, the district has argued that IID “legally acquired and owns the water rights to the Colorado River water that it diverts and delivers to the Imperial Valley,” and that those rights are held by IID “in trust for its uses and purposes” under irrigation district law.

IID was therefore, “well within” its powers when it adopted the EDP to apportion water to all its water users.

More information about the suit can be found at:
https://www.iid.com/water/rules-and-regulations/edp-litigation

Return to full list >>