Equitable Distribution

Print

Update as of February 6, 2018

IID's board approved a resolution repealing the EDP on February 6, 2018. IID water users will not be limited by an apportionment of water; however, in the absence of the EDP, all water users will continue to be subject to the requirement of reasonable and beneficial use standards. In addition, the district will continue to be subject to the 3.1 million acre-foot annual consumptive use cap set forth under the Quantification Settlement Agreement and the rules of the federal Inadvertent Overrun and Payback Policy.

Background
On October 28, 2013, the IID Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 26-2013,thereby adopting a revised Equitable Distribution Plan and authorizing implementation of the EDP, including a hybrid method of apportionment that had a historical use component and a straight-line component.  The lawsuit by Michael Abatti challenging the Equitable Distribution Plan adopted in October 2013 (Michael Abatti, et al. v. ImperialIrrigation District case No. ECU07980) was filed on November 27, 2013.

On August 15, 2017, Judge Brooks Anderholt issued a statement of decision in the case. A writ of mandate and a declaratory judgment were issued on August 25 and September 19, 2017, respectively. The writ of mandate, attached, directs IID to repeal the EDP. IID filed a notice of appeal on September 26, 2017.

Mr. Abatti filed a notice of cross-appeal on October 16, 2017.Mr. Abatti sought an order from the appellate court to mandate the trial court to enforce its writ of mandate and declaratory judgment while the appeal on the merits is pending. In contrast, IID sought appellate court confirmation that a stay is in place pending the appeal on the merits of the case to maintain the status quo of implementation of the EDP with the hybrid method of apportionment, which has been in place since its adoption in 2013. On January 31, 2018, the appellate court issued two orders, denying both Abatti's and IID's writs. The net effect of the appellate court orders is that there is no stay and the court is not directed to pursue any enforcement of its writ of mandate and judgment.

In the absence of an EDP, all IID water users continue to be subject to the requirement of reasonable and beneficial use of water under the California Constitution, Article X, section 2. IID continues to be subject to the 3.1 million acre-foot annual consumptive use cap under the Quantification Settlement Agreement and the rules of the federal Inadvertent Overrun and Payback Policy, which set forth the limitations under which IID may exceed its annual consumptive use cap, including payback requirements, and the circumstances under which IID cannot exceed its annual consumptive use cap.

 Background Documents
 August 15, 2017 Statement of Decision [PDF]
 August 22, 2018 Appellate Court Order [PDF]

February 6, 2018 Board Memo and Resolution Repealing EDP [PDF]

 May 2, 2018 Appeal [PDF]
 May 8, 2018 Board Memo [PDF]

 

Free viewers are required for some of the attached documents.
They can be downloaded by clicking on the icons below.

Acrobat Reader Flash Player QuickTime Windows Media Player Microsoft Silverlight Word Viewer Excel Viewer PowerPoint Viewer